The EvalScribe Teacher Evaluation Blog — AI, Frameworks, & Observation Tips

Danielson vs. Marzano: A Side-by-Side Comparison of the Two Biggest Teacher Evaluation Frameworks

Danielson vs. Marzano: A Side-by-Side Comparison of the Two Biggest Teacher Evaluation Frameworksby: Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D.Published on: 12/08/2026

Danielson vs. Marzano compared: domains, rating scales, philosophy, and which districts use each — the two frameworks behind most U.S. teacher evaluations.

Danielson vs. Marzano: A Side-by-Side Comparison of the Two Biggest Teacher Evaluation Frameworks

AI for New Jersey Teacher Evaluations: How AchieveNJ Works, and Where AI Helps

AI for New Jersey Teacher Evaluations: How AchieveNJ Works, and Where AI Helpsby: Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D.Published on: 02/08/2026

How New Jersey's AchieveNJ teacher evaluation works: the component weights (teacher practice, SGOs, mSGP), the four rating tiers, the approved instruments, and the observation cycle, plus where AI helps and where judgment stays human.

AI for New Jersey Teacher Evaluations: How AchieveNJ Works, and Where AI Helps

AI for New Hampshire Teacher Evaluations: Local Control, Danielson, and Where AI Helps

AI for New Hampshire Teacher Evaluations: Local Control, Danielson, and Where AI Helpsby: Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D.Published on: 02/08/2026

How New Hampshire teacher evaluation works: HB 142 local control, why Danielson is the common instrument, multiple measures, and the three teacher tracks, plus where AI helps with the write-up and where the judgment stays with the evaluator.

AI for New Hampshire Teacher Evaluations: Local Control, Danielson, and Where AI Helps

AI for Idaho Teacher Evaluations

AI for Idaho Teacher Evaluationsby: Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D.Published on: 02/08/2026

How Idaho teacher evaluation works now: the Danielson framework (four domains), professional practice as the majority plus a required student-achievement measure, the rating levels, and where AI helps with the write-up.

AI for Idaho Teacher Evaluations